A drawer in Bård Breivik's studio in Badebakken
contains a collection of Chinese cicadas. These are not biological
specimens, but insects crafted in a broad range of materials,
colours and shapes. Some are long and flat with shallow patterns
scored into their surfaces to suggest the insect's anatomy, others
are round and chubby and look more like oversized larvae. Many
of them are made of green, grey or white jade, others of dark
wood or red coral. The artist has collected these cicadas during
his trips to China over the years. The collection probably numbers
several hundred objects.
Spread about the studio are several of Breivik's
own works. Some hang on the walls, others stand on tables and
boxes or lie on the floor. Most are new and belong to the project
Score for a Longer Conversation (Partitur for en lengre
samtale); for these are the objects that will be exhibited
in Helsinki in May. Here we find objects finished in red and black
Chinese lacquer, or made of oxidised bronze or laminated wood.
These slender, elongated elements of Breivik's "score"
resonate with a faint echo of the cicadas in the drawer.
It was in the early 1980s that Breivik began working
on the series of objects that eventually resulted in Score
for a Longer Conversation. This was not the first time he
had produced series of objects. In The Oars Series (Åreserien),
which he worked on in the late 1970s, his point of departure was
a tangible utilitarian object. A rowing paddle of standard dimensions
served as model for a number of variants made of different materials.
In his subsequent work he sought to find a form that was more
abstract and "archetypal" in nature. What he eventually
settled on was something resembling a small shell or the hull
of a boat. This basic form has proved an inexhaustible source
for Breivik. He has returned to it again and again. It crops up
in ever new variations, rendered in a vast range of materials
and techniques from various parts of the world. All in all the
series encompasses some three to four hundred objects created
over a twenty-year period.
Variations on a theme
When Malmö Konsthall mounted what has so far
been the biggest retrospective of Breivik's work, they exhibited
a total of 88 Score objects from the years 1986-96. Among
them were objects made of bamboo, birch root, bark, Brazilian
liana, bronze, copper, zinc and pressed steel painted with car
enamel, to mention just a few - alongside more unusual and sophisticated
combinations of materials such as mahogany/mother of pearl/lacquer
or pressed steel/lacquer and eggshell.
One of the most fascinating things about the Score
objects is this wealth of variation. Even though they are all
based on a single model, the finished objects are highly individual.
Just like the cicadas, each has its own unique personality. The
artist's latest black and red lacquered objects, for example,
are closed and compact in shape. The black ones have curved backs
but flatten out towards their extremities, ending in duck-bill
forms. They are reminiscent of elongated, stylised cars, or the
deformed foetuses of some double-beaked creature. By contrast,
the oxidised bronze objects are open and fractured. These have
been given the working title "sandal series", since
their bronze hoops are suggestive of sandal straps. Some of them
consist of rows of single "straps", in others the straps
form zigzags or are interwoven in various ways.
Thus each object has its individual features while
at the same time being part of one of Score's various "families".
Together they constitute series within series. Objects made of
one and the same substance can be said to form core families,
yet they also have cross links in terms of other properties such
as form, colour, mode of construction and surface treatment. In
this respect as well Score reminds us of the cicada collection.
Setting a standard
The Score objects are not just based on a
single form, they are also almost identical in length: 1.2 metres.
Dimensions are always significant in Breivik's work. He generally
adopts a set of dimensions - a format - in advance as a limitation
within which to work. In a sense he imposes on himself an "academic"
standard. Over the years he has worked with a wide range of such
formats. Whereas the boxes he created in the 1970s were full of
small, almost jewel-like objects, many of his later diabase sculptures
are enormous in size.
When Breivik began work on the slender hull shapes,
his plan was to make them man-sized, in other words, 1.8 metres
in height, but this format did not function as intended and he
increased the size to 2.1 metres. Later on, however, he wished
to work on a smaller scale and reduced the length to a quarter
of what it had been. It was a series of these roughly half-metre-long
objects that were first exhibited under the title of Score
for a Longer Conversation. The occasion was the 1984 exhibition
"Art Now" in Toyama, Japan. Today that series of smaller
objects bears the name The Small Score (Det lille partituret).
In 1986, in connection with the exhibition "After
Nature" at the Germans van Eck gallery in New York, he changed
the format once again, this time to 1.2 metres. It is the objects
of this size that make up the Score for a Longer Conversation
such as it is today. This size proved to have a number
of advantages. Not least, it was easy to handle. He could carry
an object under his arm, or in the boot of a car or taxi. This
greatly reduced the need for specialised transport, a fact highly
conducive to Breivik's flexible way of working. In 1987, when
he travelled around the world, he could even take his object models
with him in his backpack - each divided into two pieces 60 cm
in length.
We relate to things in the world on the basis of
our own bodily dimensions. Breivik's changes between different
formats represent an investigation into the significance of size
for a thing's character, and for the way we perceive it. He himself
describes the 1.2 metre Score objects as a little too big
to be objects and just a little too small to be sculptures. For
their own part, the objects of The Small Score are closer
to the realm of handcraft. The same is true of the most recent
objects of 60 cm in length, which Breivik presents for the first
time in this exhibition at the Galleri Anhava. These new objects
use the same basic form as the other Score objects, thus
creating an interaction between the various dimensions in the
exhibition.
A musical score
The way Score is displayed varies from one
exhibition to another, depending partly on the nature of the venue
and the number of objects to be shown. In Toyama the disposition
of the work suggested direct associations with a musical score.
Some of the objects were mounted on one wall in two rows one above
the other, while the remainder were arranged on the floor in two
rows in front of the wall. Each row was thereby reminiscent of
a single part in a score, with each object equivalent to a note
on the stave. The objects varied in character, some being heavy,
others light, some pale in colour, others dark. The distances
between the objects also varied, helping to give the work a fine
rhythmical quality.
In Malmö the objects were mounted one after
the other, as in a long frieze. In one sense Score resembles
a Minimalist series composed of numerous identical objects, in
another it has little at all in common with Minimalism's ideal
of mechanical production and the resulting "pure" forms,
which are intended to have no reference beyond themselves. The
objects of Score are full of references, and it is one
of their obvious features that they display a range of fabrication
methods. Moreover, repetition has a very different quality in
Breivik's work. Although his starting point is always a single
basic form, that form is subjected to endless variation, so that
it is not "the same thing" that is repeated, but always
something "different". Despite its relatively strict
premise, this gives Score a quality of richness and abundance.
But although Breivik's objects differ from one another, this does
not mean that each is equally effective in its own right. Many
of them are powerful and independent in character, while others
can be compared to commas or filler words such as "er"
and "um", yet still the latter are needed for the work
to function as a whole.
In its basic character, Score is an open-ended
work. It will never be finished. Some of the objects are sold
and depart into the wider world, whereas others are forever being
added. Each time some part of the work is exhibited, new constellations
and "conversations" arise between its various elements.
But the conversation is pursued not just among the objects that
are at any one time on display. One can also imagine a longer
conversation involving all the Score objects, both those
that are still in the possession of the artist and all the others
that are now in museums or owned by private individuals around
the world.
Conversations
On closer acquaintance we discover that Score
for a Longer Conversation is about not just one longer conversation,
but a range of extended conversations pursued in parallel. The
conversational dimension is, for example, an important aspect
of the object production as such. When Breivik travelled round
the world in 1987, one of his aims was to study local craft traditions
in the places he visited. A number of the Score objects
were accordingly created in collaboration with local craftsmen.
Basing their work on Breivik's models, they have produced objects
using their own craft techniques. One example of this approach
is Breivik's collaboration with Sugimoto, a Japanese roof tiler
from a professional dynasty that stretches back more than twenty
generations. Sugimoto's roof tiling technique is used on temple
rooves and is very time consuming. Tiny pieces of bark are put
together in several layers so as to form a thick water-repellent
covering. In recent years Breivik has cultivated an extensive
collaboration with Chinese craftsmen. Both the lacquered objects
and many of the bronzes in this exhibition were made in China.
In addition to the often wordless "conversations"
between the artist and the craftsmen, we also find a kind of dialogue
within each of the separate works. In the abovementioned example
there is a dialogue between a traditional and a newer form of
handcraft. The use of resources and knowledge represented by various
craft traditions around the world has been one of the central
ideas behind Score.
Yet Score encompasses not just objects made
using traditional materials and techniques. Many employ modern
materials such as steel. This vast scope ranging from the traditional
to the modern is also present in the work's basic form, the boat-like
hull, which contains a reference to a constructional tradition
that has been practised in all corners of the world since time
immemorial, yet which has never become outdated. The Score
objects carry within them this reference to everything from the
simple dugout to the modern aircraft fuselage. The conversation
that Score initiates can therefore also be described as
one about time and history.
Furthermore, this latter aspect demonstrates that
Score for a Longer Conversation is engaged in a dialogue
with Breivik's own earlier works. One such work is History
I of 1974, which consists of a flat, leather-lined box with
a lid. Inside the box lie pieces of flint, worked pieces of iron
and highly polished steel rods. The objects are sorted according
to material, with each group consisting of twelve (4x3) items
neatly ordered into serried rows. Breivik's arrangement is reminiscent
of museum displays of archeological finds. The various materials
- flint, iron and steel - seem to correspond to the archeologist's
categorisation of artefacts according to stone, iron and bronze
ages, with the difference that Breivik includes one material that
represents our own age.
In contrast to the small objects in the box, those
of Score have not been given a fixed arrangement. And although
they too take up the theme of time and history, they do not define
a clear sequence of development. But much like the objects in
History I, the Score objects collectively amount
to a collection, despite the fact that the objects are not all
gathered together in a single place. Work on Score has
the character of a collector's project, with the constituent objects
amounting to a kind of archive covering a wealth of different
materials and techniques, stories and references. Thinking back
to the cicada collection in Breivik's studio, Score could,
as the artist himself has suggested, perhaps be described as a
cultural insect collection.
Torild Gjesvik